John Howard on the North-Korean nuclear threat..:

Interesting talks.. Prime Minister John Howard talks about North Korean nuclear test. I have put a link for you all in the title of this post so you can watch the video of this interview, so I won’t go into too much detail. I only wish to discuss this interview on a few points:

Question: We have troops in Iraq because we believed Iraq had weapons of Mass Destruction. North Korea proudly boasts it has Weapons of Mass Destruction, could we have troops in North Korea?

Answer: Well I don't think we should be talking about invading North Korea. We should try very had to solve this diplomatically. You never take military action off the table, but it's not something the Americans are contemplating. I spoke to President Bush last night and they are not talking about an invasion of North Korea. They are trying to get the maximum world pressure..

So what is he talking about here? First of all, the man has no opinion of his own. More than half of his answer was "what the Americans said" and not what 'he thinks'. I mean is it not bad enough that we invaded one country ruled by a torturous, pointless and irrational dictator who the governments wrongfully thought may have weapons of mass destruction.. but we won’t contemplate disarming a second country ruled by an equally me torturous, pointless and irrational dictator who openly boasts of having a nuclear weapon? But nah.. to make things worse, we had to have a prime minister who has no idea whatsoever. He has no policy of his own about Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran or North-Korea. Ever since 9/11, we've repeatedly seen John Howard chant whatever is said by Bush or Blair. So Mr. Howard borrows policies from UK and US, and burries his efforts and that of his nation in those of UK and US.

The question of why we don’t treat North-Korean president the same way we treated Iraq if not any harshly after this Nuclear test remains. But then again.. I've already discussed the double standards in world politics in my last post so we’ll let that issue rest today..!

Coup and Political Double Standards..:

Would it be a surprise for anyone to know that America has a policy (along with many of it's allies such as UK) that it will not support and will infact oppose any coup and a government/administration that comes into power through such means..? Of course they have such a policy. But do they abide by it? Well... that's a whole different ball game.

In 1999, the Pakistani Army under the leadership of General Pervez Musharraf celebrated my birthday by seizing control of power in Pakistan. Yes.. another coup in Pakistan. Although there was some opposing comments made about it in the west, little was said about restoring power to the democratically elected Primi Minister Nawaz Sharif. An immideate reaction was freezing of some loans to Pakistan and such other santions by different countries and organisations. But no further actions were taken.. and countries actually started going back to their nomal relationship with Pakistan as General Musharraf went about breaking his promises of restoring democracy etc. It has now been almost 7 years.. and Mr. Musharraf is by not means likely to restore power to the people of Pakistan or obeying the constitution. In these 7 years, instead of opposing the Military rule and dictatorship of Musharraf, the west (countires such as America and UK) have become close allies of Mr. Musharraf... now beat that.. Musharraf says..!

Now the list will go on, but let's jump straight to 2006 and look at a very recent example. The coup in Thailand. This year, it was a few days before my b'day that the Thai military decided that it was going to oust the democratically elected Primi Minister who was touring another country. Once again, there has been some opposing voices in the west, but nobody has said a word about reinstating power to the elected Prime Minister. The buzz words around are, "the world is watching with concern". You wait 'n see.. the world will still be watching in a few years time and little would've changed.

These examples along with unforgettable example of Saddam Hussain goes to show the double standards in the world's approach to these coups. It's interesting to see how some coups can be better than others.. since some attract more criticism than others. It's also interesting how someone like Saddam is allowed to rule over Iraq for so many decades and torture his people.. and also get so much support from the US for so long.. and just when it suited the US and it's allies, Saddam became the worst man in the world and had to be taken out of power through the means of a bloody war..!

O well, let's sit back and watch with concern what happens next in Thailand. Don't be surprised if you see the stories of Pakistan and/or Iraq repeating themselves in Thailand.

And God said.. 'Let there be War..!"

War on Terror, War on terrorists, or just a bloody war..?

I’m not sure if America, Britain and their so called allies are fighting a war on terrorism or just the terrorists. I’m not sure because I don’t think the administrations of these countries are sure themselves. I have two reasons for saying this.

Firstly, how can the world politicians claim they are fighting terrorism when they can’t even agree on what exactly is ‘terrorism’. Not long ago, the world leaders met (something to do with some organisation called UN) to pledge their dislike for terrorists and pledge that they will fight them together. Don’t you think it’s funny that these people were pledging to fight terrorism together when in the same meeting, they couldn’t agree on a definition of terrorism?

Secondly I think is the recent report issued collectively by a group of all 16 major intelligence agencies in the US. The study states that the threat of terrorism has increased after war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It also states that the Islamic fundamentalism which is seen as the cause of most of the terror around the world these days has increased after the Iraq war. Yet American propaganda will have you believe that it’s wining the war on terror.

I think America, Britain, Australia and the likes are all in denial. Denial that Iraq was a the biggest bungle-up of the 21st century. In spite of the report I mentioned above, I heard Tony Blair on radio yesterday.. completely missing the point. Instead of addressing the issue, he was going on about how it’s not the British Army that’s killing all these people in Iraq and elsewhere today. It’s the terrorists. Well of course it’s not the British Army. And that’s the whole point the report is making.. that the terror has increased around the world. Believe me.. Tony Blair has lost it..!

Admission of our errors is the first step in correcting them. It appears however that the denial of people who are supposedly on war with terrorism will stand in the way of logical thinking. America and Britain along with all their allies came up with a pile of alligation against Iraq to build up a case for war. Soon after the war supposedly finished, all those reasons went walking and in came a whole new excuse.. all these world leaders, instead of admitting their failure in reading the intelligence started talking about how they have liberated Iraq. Well that's not what they said before the war..! But anyway, all that is old and perhaps irrelevant now. What is relevant however is that whatever their intentions might have been, and even if we were to believe that they intended good for everyone, their methods were wrong. They don’t agree on what terrorism is, but even if we agreed that unknowingly they are in fact fighting terrorism.. their methods are far from effective. And that’s what this new report goes to prove.

Learn people learn.. we aren’t doing ourselves any favours here.